Physics / Nuclear Physics II Hadron Symmetries & Nuclear Forces 100% Free Open Access
Chapter 1 • Theory & Derivations

The Deuteron Problem & Two-Nucleon Bound State

Exhaustive treatment of the two-nucleon bound system: deuteron ground state properties (J^π = 1⁺, B = 2.2245 MeV, I = 0), radial Schrödinger equation in central square well potentials, depth-radius relationship, absence of bound excited states and the ¹S₀ virtual level, non-zero electric quadrupole moment Q = +0.286 fm², non-central tensor force and ³S₁-³D₁ state mixing (η ≈ 0.0256), magnetic dipole moment discrepancy, root-mean-square radius (R_rms ≈ 2.14 fm), and photodisintegration kinematics and cross-sections (γ + d → n + p).

§1.1General Properties of the Deuteron Ground State (J^π = 1⁺, B = 2.2245 MeV, I = 0)

1. The Fundamental Two-Nucleon Bound System

The deuteron (${}^2\text{H}$ or $d$), consisting of one proton and one neutron, is the simplest bound nuclear system. Just as the hydrogen atom serves as the fundamental testing ground for atomic physics and quantum electrodynamics, the deuteron is the foundational benchmark for the microscopic nucleon-nucleon ($N$-$N$) interaction.

The key empirically measured static ground-state properties of the deuteron are:

  • Binding Energy ($B$): Measured via high-precision mass spectrometry and the ${}^1\text{H}(n, \gamma){}^2\text{H}$ capture gamma-ray energy ($E_\gamma = 2.224575\text{ MeV}$): $$B = [M({}^1\text{H}) + m_n - M({}^2\text{H})] c^2 = 2.224575 \pm 0.000009\text{ MeV}$$ Compared to typical nuclear binding energies of $\sim 8\text{ MeV/nucleon}$, the deuteron is exceptionally loosely bound ($B/A \approx 1.112\text{ MeV/nucleon}$).
  • Total Angular Momentum (Spin $J^\pi$): Experimentally determined to be $J = 1$ with positive parity ($\pi = +1$), written as $J^\pi = 1^+$.
  • Isospin ($I$): Because the neutron and proton have $I_3 = -1/2$ and $+1/2$, the total two-nucleon isospin can be $I = 0$ (antisymmetric singlet) or $I = 1$ (symmetric triplet). Because neither the diproton (${}^2\text{He}$, $I_3 = +1$) nor the dineutron (${}^2n$, $I_3 = -1$) exists as a bound state, the bound deuteron must be an isospin singlet ($I = 0, I_3 = 0$).
  • Magnetic Dipole Moment ($\mu_d$): Measured via nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR): $$\mu_d = +0.85743823 \pm 0.00000002\text{ }\mu_N$$ This is remarkably close to, but measurably distinct from, the simple algebraic sum of the free proton and neutron magnetic dipole moments: $$\mu_p + \mu_n = +2.792847\text{ }\mu_N - 1.913043\text{ }\mu_N = +0.879804\text{ }\mu_N$$ The small difference $\Delta\mu = \mu_d - (\mu_p + \mu_n) = -0.022366\text{ }\mu_N$ provides direct evidence for orbital angular momentum mixing ($L = 2$).
  • Electric Quadrupole Moment ($Q$): $$Q = +0.002859 \pm 0.000030\text{ b} = +0.2859 \pm 0.0030\text{ fm}^2$$ A pure $S$-wave ($L = 0$) state is spherically symmetric and must have $Q \equiv 0$. The non-zero positive quadrupole moment proves that the deuteron is prolate (elongated along its spin axis), demonstrating that the nuclear force contains a non-central tensor component.

§1.2Central Square Well Potential Model & Depth-Radius Relation

1. The Two-Body Schrödinger Equation in Relative Coordinates

Let $\vec{r}_p$ and $\vec{r}_n$ denote the coordinates of the proton and neutron with masses $m_p \approx m_n \equiv M$. Introducing the center-of-mass coordinate $\vec{R} = \frac{1}{2}(\vec{r}_p + \vec{r}_n)$ and relative coordinate $\vec{r} = \vec{r}_p - \vec{r}_n$, the two-body Hamiltonian separates. With reduced mass $\mu = \frac{M\cdot M}{M + M} = \frac{M}{2}$, the relative motion satisfies:

$$\left[ -\frac{\hbar^2}{2\mu} \nabla^2 + V(\vec{r}) \\right] \psi(\vec{r}) = E \psi(\vec{r}) = -B \psi(\vec{r})$$

where $E = -B < 0$ is the bound-state energy. Replacing $\frac{\hbar^2}{2\mu} = \frac{\hbar^2}{M}$:

$$\left[ -\frac{\hbar^2}{M} \nabla^2 + V(\vec{r}) \\right] \psi(\vec{r}) = -B \psi(\vec{r})$$

2. The Central Spherical Square Well Approximation

As a first physical approximation, consider a central, spherically symmetric attractive potential well of depth $V_0$ and range $R$:

$$V(r) = \begin{cases} -V_0, & r < R \\ 0, & r > R \end{cases}$$

Assuming a spherically symmetric $S$-state ($L = 0$), the wavefunction is $\psi(\vec{r}) = \frac{u(r)}{r} Y_{00}(\theta, \phi)$, where the radial wavefunction $u(r)$ satisfies:

$$\frac{d^2 u(r)}{dr^2} + \frac{M}{\hbar^2}\left[ E - V(r) \\right] u(r) = 0$$

3. Interior and Exterior Solutions & Boundary Matching

Region I ($r < R$): $V(r) = -V_0$. Defining $k_1^2 \equiv \frac{M(V_0 - B)}{\hbar^2} > 0$:

$$\frac{d^2 u_I}{dr^2} + k_1^2 u_I = 0 \implies u_I(r) = A \sin(k_1 r)$$

(the cosine solution is excluded by the boundary condition $u(0) = 0$ to keep $\psi(0)$ finite).

Region II ($r > R$): $V(r) = 0$. Defining $\gamma^2 \equiv \frac{M B}{\hbar^2} > 0$:

$$\frac{d^2 u_{II}}{dr^2} - \gamma^2 u_{II} = 0 \implies u_{II}(r) = C e^{-\gamma r}$$

(the growing exponential $e^{+\gamma r}$ is rejected for normalizability).

Matching the logarithmic derivatives $\frac{1}{u}\frac{du}{dr}$ at the boundary $r = R$:

$$\left. \frac{u_I'(r)}{u_I(r)} \\right|_{r=R} = \left. \frac{u_{II}'(r)}{u_{II}(r)} \\right|_{r=R} \implies k_1 \cot(k_1 R) = -\gamma$$

Because $B \approx 2.22\text{ MeV} \ll V_0 \approx 35\text{ to }40\text{ MeV}$, the exterior decay parameter $\gamma \approx \sqrt{\frac{M B}{\hbar^2}} \approx 0.232\text{ fm}^{-1}$ is small. In the approximation $\gamma \to 0$ (zero binding energy limit):

$$\cot(k_1 R) \approx 0 \implies k_1 R \approx \frac{\pi}{2}$$ $$\frac{M(V_0 - B) R^2}{\hbar^2} \approx \frac{\pi^2}{4} \implies V_0 R^2 \approx \frac{\pi^2 \hbar^2}{4 M} \approx 102.8\text{ MeV}\cdot\text{fm}^2$$

For a realistic nuclear force range $R \approx 2.0\text{ fm}$, this yields a well depth $V_0 \approx 35\text{ to }38\text{ MeV}$, demonstrating that the deuteron is a shallowly bound state sitting near the threshold of the potential well.

§1.3Radial Wavefunction Solution & Absence of Bound Excited States

1. The Deuteron Radial Wavefunction

Normalizing the composite radial wavefunction $\int_0^\infty |u(r)|^2 dr = 1$:

$$u(r) = \begin{cases} A \sin(k_1 r), & r \le R \\ A \sin(k_1 R) e^{-\gamma (r - R)}, & r > R \end{cases}$$

The decay parameter $\gamma$ determines the asymptotic behavior outside the potential:

$$\gamma = \frac{\sqrt{M B}}{\hbar} = \frac{\sqrt{938.9\text{ MeV} \times 2.2246\text{ MeV}}}{197.33\text{ MeV}\cdot\text{fm}} \approx 0.2317\text{ fm}^{-1}$$

The characteristic decay length (the "tail" of the deuteron) is:

$$R_{\text{decay}} = \frac{1}{\gamma} \approx \frac{1}{0.2317\text{ fm}^{-1}} \approx 4.316\text{ fm}$$

Because the nuclear potential radius is only $R \approx 1.7\text{ to }2.1\text{ fm}$, the probability of finding the nucleons outside the range of their mutual nuclear interaction is:

$$P(r > R) = \int_R^\infty |u_{II}(r)|^2 dr = \frac{1}{1 + \gamma R} \approx \frac{1}{1 + (0.232)(2.0)} \approx 68\%$$

Thus, the neutron and proton spend approximately 70% of their time outside the nuclear potential well, illustrating the exceptionally diffuse, halo-like nature of the deuteron.

2. The Non-Existence of Bound Excited States

Can the deuteron have bound excited states?

  1. Higher Radial Nodes ($n = 2, S$-wave): A second bound state with $L = 0$ requires $k_1 R > \frac{3\pi}{2}$. This would demand a potential depth: $$V_0 R^2 \ge \frac{9\pi^2 \hbar^2}{4 M} \approx 9 \times 103\text{ MeV}\cdot\text{fm}^2 \approx 927\text{ MeV}\cdot\text{fm}^2$$ which is an order of magnitude deeper than the physical nuclear well ($V_0 R^2 \approx 105\text{ MeV}\cdot\text{fm}^2$).
  2. Orbital Excitations ($L \ge 1$, $P$-states): For $L = 1$, the effective potential includes a centrifugal barrier: $$V_{\text{eff}}(r) = V(r) + \frac{\hbar^2 L(L+1)}{M r^2} = V(r) + \frac{2\hbar^2}{M r^2}$$ At $r = R \approx 2\text{ fm}$, $\frac{2\hbar^2}{M R^2} \approx \frac{2 \times 41.47}{4} \approx 20.7\text{ MeV}$. This repulsive barrier pushes the ground state energy far above zero, preventing any bound $P$-state.
  3. Singlet Spin State (${}^1S_0, S=0$): In the spin-singlet state, the $N$-$N$ interaction is slightly weaker ($V_0^{(s)} \approx 32\text{ MeV}$ compared to $V_0^{(t)} \approx 38\text{ MeV}$). This depth is insufficient to bind: the singlet state is an unbound virtual state with energy $E_s \approx -0.066\text{ MeV} = -66\text{ keV}$ (a pole on the second Riemann sheet).

Therefore, the deuteron possesses no bound excited states whatsoever—neither radial, orbital, nor spin excitations exist.

§1.4Electric Quadrupole Moment & Departure from Spherical Symmetry

1. The Classical and Quantum Quadrupole Moment

The electric quadrupole moment measures the departure of the nuclear charge distribution from spherical symmetry. Classically, for a charge distribution $\rho_c(\vec{r})$:

$$Q_{\text{classical}} = \frac{1}{e} \int \rho_c(\vec{r}) \left( 3z^2 - r^2 \\right) d^3r = \frac{1}{e} \int \rho_c(\vec{r}) r^2 (3\cos^2\theta - 1) d^3r$$

In quantum mechanics, the quadrupole operator for a system of nucleons with coordinates $\vec{r}_i$ and charges $e_i$ is:

$$\hat{Q} = \sum_{i=1}^A \frac{e_i}{e} \left( 3z_i^2 - r_i^2 \\right)$$

For the deuteron, choosing the center of mass as the origin, the proton coordinate is $\vec{r}_p = +\frac{1}{2}\vec{r}$ and the neutron coordinate is $\vec{r}_n = -\frac{1}{2}\vec{r}$. Since the neutron has zero electric charge ($e_n = 0$) and the proton has charge $e_p = e$:

$$\hat{Q} = 3 z_p^2 - r_p^2 = 3\left(\frac{z}{2}\\right)^2 - \left(\frac{r}{2}\\right)^2 = \frac{1}{4}\left( 3z^2 - r^2 \\right) = \frac{1}{4} r^2 \sqrt{\frac{16\pi}{5}} Y_{20}(\theta, \phi)$$

The observable quadrupole moment $Q$ is defined as the expectation value in the substate of maximum magnetic projection ($M_J = J = 1$):

$$Q \equiv \langle \psi_{J=1, M_J=1} | \hat{Q} | \psi_{J=1, M_J=1} \rangle$$

2. Impossibility of Quadrupole Moment in a Pure S-Wave

If the deuteron ground state were a pure $S$-wave ($L = 0$), its spatial wavefunction would be spherically symmetric ($\psi \propto Y_{00}$). Then:

$$\langle Y_{00} | (3\cos^2\theta - 1) | Y_{00} \rangle = \frac{1}{4\pi} \int_0^{2\pi} d\phi \int_{-1}^1 (3\cos^2\theta - 1) d(\cos\theta) = 0$$

By parity conservation and Wigner-Eckart selection rules, $\langle L=0 | Y_{20} | L=0 \rangle \equiv 0$.

However, high-precision radio-frequency molecular beam spectroscopy (Kellogg, Rabi, Ramsey, Zacharias, 1939) established conclusively that the deuteron has a non-zero quadrupole moment:

$$Q = +0.002859 \pm 0.000030\text{ b} = +0.2859\text{ fm}^2$$

The positive sign ($Q > 0$) demonstrates that the deuteron charge distribution is a prolate spheroid (cigar-shaped, elongated along the spin vector $\vec{J}$) rather than oblate ($Q < 0$) or spherical ($Q = 0$). This non-spherical deformation provides irrefutable proof that the nuclear force is non-central.

§1.5The Non-Central Tensor Force & D-State Wavefunction Admixture

1. The Phenomenological Tensor Operator

To construct a non-central interaction that satisfies parity conservation ($\pi = +1$), time-reversal invariance, rotational invariance, and isospin symmetry, the interaction must couple the nucleon spin operators $\vec{\sigma}_1, \vec{\sigma}_2$ to the relative spatial coordinate unit vector $\hat{r} = \vec{r}/r$. The unique scalar operator formed from the rank-2 spin tensor and rank-2 spatial coordinate tensor is the tensor operator:

$$S_{12} \equiv 3(\vec{\sigma}_1\cdot\hat{r})(\vec{\sigma}_2\cdot\hat{r}) - \vec{\sigma}_1\cdot\vec{\sigma}_2$$

Key mathematical properties of $S_{12}$:

  • Angle Averaging: $\int S_{12} d\Omega = 0$. Averaged over all space directions, the tensor force vanishes; it produces no contribution to pure spherically symmetric $S$-states.
  • Singlet Annihilation: For a singlet spin state ($S = 0$), $\vec{\sigma}_1 + \vec{\sigma}_2 = 0 \implies \vec{\sigma}_1\cdot\vec{\sigma}_2 = -3$. It is readily proven that $S_{12}|S=0\rangle \equiv 0$. The tensor force acts only in spin-triplet ($S = 1$) states.
  • Orbital Coupling: $S_{12}$ does not commute with orbital angular momentum $\vec{L}^2$ or spin $\vec{S}^2$, but commutes with total angular momentum $\vec{J} = \vec{L} + \vec{S}$. It can mix states with $\Delta L = 0, \pm 2$.

2. The Admixed Wavefunction: ³S₁ and ³D₁

With $J^\pi = 1^+$, the allowed quantum states combining $L$ and $S = 1$ with positive parity ($\pi = (-1)^L = +1$) are:

  • $L = 0 \implies {}^3S_1$ (Principal component)
  • $L = 2 \implies {}^3D_1$ (Admixed component)

(States with $L = 1$, such as ${}^3P_1$ or ${}^1P_1$, are forbidden because they have odd parity $\pi = (-1)^1 = -1$).

Therefore, the general ground-state wavefunction of the deuteron is an exact quantum superposition:

$$\psi_d(\vec{r}) = \frac{u(r)}{r} \mathcal{Y}_{J=1, M}^{L=0, S=1}(\hat{r}) + \frac{w(r)}{r} \mathcal{Y}_{J=1, M}^{L=2, S=1}(\hat{r})$$

where $u(r)$ is the radial $S$-wave function and $w(r)$ is the radial $D$-wave function, normalized such that:

$$\int_0^\infty \left[ u^2(r) + w^2(r) \\right] dr = P_S + P_D = 1$$

Empirical analysis of the quadrupole moment and magnetic moment yields a $D$-state probability of:

$$P_D = \int_0^\infty w^2(r) dr \approx 4\% \text{ to } 6\%, \quad P_S \approx 94\% \text{ to } 96\%$$

The asymptotic $D/S$ ratio is denoted $\eta \equiv \lim_{r\to\infty} \frac{w(r)}{u(r)} \approx 0.0256 \pm 0.0004$.

§1.6Magnetic Dipole Moment Discrepancy & Root-Mean-Square Radius

1. Derivation of the Deuteron Magnetic Moment

The magnetic moment operator of the two-nucleon system is given by the sum of orbital and spin contributions:

$$\vec{\mu} = \vec{\mu}_l + \vec{\mu}_s = \frac{e\hbar}{2 M c} \left( g_l^{(p)} \vec{l}_p + g_l^{(n)} \vec{l}_n + g_s^{(p)} \vec{s}_p + g_s^{(n)} \vec{s}_n \\right)$$

Since $\vec{l}_p = \vec{l}_n = \frac{1}{2}\vec{L}$, $g_l^{(p)} = 1$, and $g_l^{(n)} = 0$, the orbital contribution is $\vec{\mu}_l = \frac{1}{2}\vec{L}\mu_N$. The spin contribution is $\vec{\mu}_s = (\mu_p \vec{\sigma}_p + \mu_n \vec{\sigma}_n)\mu_N = (\mu_p + \mu_n)\vec{S}\mu_N + (\mu_p - \mu_n)(\vec{\sigma}_p - \vec{\sigma}_n)\frac{\mu_N}{2}$.

Evaluating the expectation value in the admixed state $\psi = a_S \psi({}^3S_1) + a_D \psi({}^3D_1)$:

$$\mu_d = \langle \psi_{J=1, M=1} | \mu_z | \psi_{J=1, M=1} \rangle = (\mu_p + \mu_n) P_S + \left[ \frac{1}{2} - \frac{1}{2}(\mu_p + \mu_n) \\right] P_D$$ $$\mu_d = (\mu_p + \mu_n) - \frac{3}{2}\left( \mu_p + \mu_n - \frac{1}{2} \right) P_D$$

Substituting $\mu_p + \mu_n = 0.879804\text{ }\mu_N$:

$$\mu_d = 0.879804 - \frac{3}{2}(0.879804 - 0.5) P_D = 0.879804 - 0.5697 P_D$$

Equating this to the measured value $\mu_d = 0.857438\text{ }\mu_N$:

$$0.5697 P_D = 0.879804 - 0.857438 = 0.022366 \implies P_D \approx \frac{0.022366}{0.5697} \approx 3.93\%$$

Relativistic corrections and meson exchange currents (MEC) slightly shift this value, establishing $P_D \approx 4\% \text{ to } 6\%$.

2. The Root-Mean-Square Radius of the Deuteron

The charge radius of the deuteron is measured via high-energy elastic electron-deuteron scattering ($e + d \to e + d$) and precision laser spectroscopy of muonic deuterium:

$$\langle r_d^2 \rangle_{\text{ch}}^{1/2} = 2.1413 \pm 0.0025\text{ fm}$$

The matter root-mean-square radius $R_{\text{matter}}$ (separation between proton and neutron centers of mass) is:

$$R_{\text{rms}} \equiv \sqrt{\langle r^2 \rangle} = \left[ \int_0^\infty r^2 (u^2(r) + w^2(r)) dr \\right]^{1/2} \approx 1.97\text{ to }2.00\text{ fm}$$

This is substantially larger than heavy atomic nuclei ($R_{\text{Pb}} \approx 1.2 \times 208^{1/3} \approx 7.1\text{ fm}$, but nucleon-nucleon average spacing is $\sim 1.8\text{ fm}$), demonstrating once again the extended spatial extent of the deuteron.

§1.7Photodisintegration of the Deuteron (γ + d → n + p Threshold & Cross-Sections)

1. Kinematics and Threshold Energy

Photodisintegration is the electromagnetic breakup of the deuteron by an incident photon:

$$\gamma + {}^2\text{H} \to n + p$$

Let $E_\gamma$ be the laboratory photon energy. Conservation of energy and linear momentum:

$$E_\gamma + M_d c^2 = E_n + E_p, \quad \frac{E_\gamma}{c} = p_n \cos\theta_n + p_p \cos\theta_p$$

Accounting for the small nuclear recoil energy ($E_{\text{recoil}} = \frac{E_\gamma^2}{2 M_d c^2} \approx 1.3\text{ keV}$), the threshold photon energy in the laboratory frame is:

$$E_{\gamma,\text{th}} = B\left( 1 + \frac{B}{2 M_d c^2} \\right) \approx B = 2.224575\text{ MeV}$$

For $E_\gamma > B$, the excess energy $E_\gamma - B$ is partitioned equally into center-of-mass kinetic energy of the escaping proton and neutron ($E_{\text{rel}} = E_\gamma - B$).

2. Electric Dipole (E1) vs Magnetic Dipole (M1) Cross Sections

The transition operator can act via electric dipole ($E1$) or magnetic dipole ($M1$) mechanisms:

  1. Magnetic Dipole Disintegration ($M1$): Dominates near the threshold ($E_\gamma - B \le 100\text{ keV}$). The incident gamma ray couples to the spin magnetic moments, flipping the triplet deuteron (${}^3S_1$) into the unbound singlet continuum (${}^1S_0$). The $M1$ cross section is isotropic ($\frac{d\sigma_{M1}}{d\Omega} \propto \text{const}$) and exhibits a sharp threshold peak: $$\sigma_{M1} \propto \frac{\sqrt{E_\gamma - B}}{E_\gamma}$$
  2. Electric Dipole Disintegration ($E1$): Dominates at energies $E_\gamma \ge 3\text{ MeV}$. The electric field of the photon couples to the proton charge displacement relative to the center of mass. This induces an electric dipole transition from the ${}^3S_1$ ground state to the ${}^3P$ continuum states ($L = 1$). The differential cross section has the characteristic $\sin^2\theta$ dipolar angular distribution: $$\frac{d\sigma_{E1}}{d\Omega} = \frac{3}{8\pi} \sigma_{E1} \sin^2\theta$$ The total $E1$ cross section as a function of relative wavevector $k = \sqrt{M(E_\gamma - B)}/\hbar$ is given by Bethe and Peierls: $$\sigma_{E1}(E_\gamma) = \frac{8\pi}{3}\left( \frac{e^2}{\hbar c} \\right) \frac{\hbar^2}{M} \frac{\gamma k^3}{(\gamma^2 + k^2)^3} = \frac{8\pi \alpha}{3 M} \frac{\sqrt{B}(E_\gamma - B)^{3/2}}{E_\gamma^3}$$ This cross section vanishes at threshold ($E_\gamma = B$), rises to a pronounced peak at $E_\gamma = 2 B \approx 4.45\text{ MeV}$ with $\sigma_{\max} \approx 2.5\text{ mb}$, and then decays asymptotically as $E_\gamma^{-3/2}$.

The total photodisintegration differential cross section is parameterized as:

$$\frac{d\sigma}{d\Omega} = a(E_\gamma) + b(E_\gamma) \sin^2\theta$$

where $a$ is the $M1$ contribution and $b$ is the $E1$ contribution.

★Solved Examination Problems: Chapter 1

SOLVED PROBLEM 1.1

Finite Square Well Potential Depth & Range of the Deuteron

Assuming the deuteron ground state can be modeled by a central spherical square well of radius $R = 2.10\text{ fm}$ with binding energy $B = 2.2246\text{ MeV}$, compute: (a) The wave decay constant $\gamma$ in the exterior region $r > R$. (b) The interior wavenumber $k_1$. (c) The exact potential well depth $V_0$ in MeV. (d) The probability $P_{\text{ext}}$ that the neutron and proton are found at a separation exceeding the potential radius $R$.

RIGOROUS DERIVATION & EXAM SOLUTION
Full Rigorous Analytical Solution
**(a) Exterior Wave Decay Constant $\gamma$:** Using reduced mass $\mu = M/2$ where $M c^2 = \frac{m_p c^2 + m_n c^2}{2} \approx 938.92\text{ MeV}$: $$\gamma = \frac{\sqrt{M B}}{\hbar} = \frac{\sqrt{(938.92\text{ MeV})(2.2246\text{ MeV})}}{197.327\text{ MeV}\cdot\text{fm}} = \frac{\sqrt{2088.72}}{197.327} = \frac{45.7026}{197.327} \approx 0.23161\text{ fm}^{-1}$$ **(b) Interior Wavenumber $k_1$:** From boundary matching at $r = R$: $$k_1 \cot(k_1 R) = -\gamma$$ Let $\xi = k_1 R$. Then $\cot\xi = -\frac{\gamma R}{\xi} = -\frac{(0.23161)(2.10)}{\xi} = -\frac{0.48638}{\xi}$. Because the well contains only one bound state, $\frac{\pi}{2} < \xi < \pi$. Solving transcendental equation $\xi \cot\xi = -0.48638$ numerically: - Try $\xi = 1.90$: $\cot(1.90) = -0.3664 \implies \xi\cot\xi = -0.696$ - Try $\xi = 1.75$: $\cot(1.75) = -0.1983 \implies \xi\cot\xi = -0.347$ - Try $\xi = 1.815$: $\cot(1.815) = -0.2678 \implies \xi\cot\xi = -0.4861$ Thus $\xi = k_1 R \approx 1.815\text{ rad}$. $$k_1 = \frac{1.815}{2.10\text{ fm}} \approx 0.8643\text{ fm}^{-1}$$ **(c) Potential Well Depth $V_0$:** From definition $k_1^2 = \frac{M(V_0 - B)}{\hbar^2}$: $$V_0 - B = \frac{\hbar^2 k_1^2}{M} = \frac{(197.327)^2 (0.8643)^2}{938.92} = \frac{38938 \times 0.7470}{938.92} \approx 30.98\text{ MeV}$$ $$V_0 = 30.98\text{ MeV} + 2.22\text{ MeV} \approx 33.20\text{ MeV}$$ The potential well depth is **$33.2\text{ MeV}$**. **(d) Probability Outside the Well ($P_{\text{ext}}$):** Using normalized wavefunction $u_I(r) = A\sin(k_1 r)$ and $u_{II}(r) = A\sin(k_1 R) e^{-\gamma(r-R)}$: $$I_1 = \int_0^R \sin^2(k_1 r) dr = \frac{R}{2} - \frac{\sin(2 k_1 R)}{4 k_1} = \frac{2.10}{2} - \frac{\sin(3.630)}{4(0.8643)} = 1.05 - \frac{-0.4623}{3.457} = 1.05 + 0.1337 = 1.1837\text{ fm}$$ $$I_2 = \int_R^\infty \sin^2(k_1 R) e^{-2\gamma(r-R)} dr = \sin^2(1.815) \frac{1}{2\gamma} = (0.9705)^2 \frac{1}{2(0.23161)} = \frac{0.9419}{0.46322} = 2.0334\text{ fm}$$ The total normalization constant is $A^{-2} = I_1 + I_2 = 1.1837 + 2.0334 = 3.2171\text{ fm}$. $$P_{\text{ext}} = \frac{I_2}{I_1 + I_2} = \frac{2.0334}{3.2171} \approx 0.632 \approx 63.2\%$$ There is a **$63.2\%$ probability** that the neutron and proton are found outside the potential well.
Final Answer & Verification

Complete rigorous derivation and proof detailed above.

SOLVED PROBLEM 1.2

D-State Admixture and the Deuteron Electric Quadrupole Moment

In the tensor force model of the deuteron, the quadrupole moment $Q$ is given in terms of the radial wavefunctions $u(r)$ ($S$-wave) and $w(r)$ ($D$-wave) by: $$Q = \frac{1}{10}\int_0^\infty r^2 \left( \sqrt{2} u(r) w(r) - \frac{1}{2} w^2(r) \right) dr$$ (a) Explain why the cross-term $u(r)w(r)$ dominates over the pure $D$-state term $w^2(r)$. (b) Assuming an empirical quadrupole moment $Q = +0.286\text{ fm}^2$ and average radial moment $\langle r^2 \rangle_{SD} \equiv \int_0^\infty r^2 u(r) w(r) dr \approx 2.05\text{ fm}^2$, calculate the approximate $D$-state mixing amplitude $a_D$ and the $D$-state probability $P_D = a_D^2$. (c) Verify whether the resulting $P_D$ is consistent with the magnetic moment discrepancy $\Delta\mu = -0.0224\text{ }\mu_N$.

RIGOROUS DERIVATION & EXAM SOLUTION
Full Rigorous Analytical Solution
**(a) Dominance of the Cross-Term:** Since the $D$-state probability $P_D \ll 1$ (typically $4\% \sim 0.04$), the amplitude $a_D = \sqrt{P_D} \approx 0.20$, whereas $a_S \approx \sqrt{0.96} \approx 0.98$. The cross-term $u(r)w(r)$ is first order in $a_D$ ($\mathcal{O}(a_D)$), whereas the $w^2(r)$ term is second order ($\mathcal{O}(a_D^2)$). Specifically, $\sqrt{2} u w \sim \sqrt{2}(0.98)(0.20) \approx 0.277$, while $\frac{1}{2} w^2 \sim 0.5(0.04) = 0.020$. The cross-term is more than 13 times larger and fully determines the magnitude and sign of $Q$. **(b) Calculation of $D$-State Mixing Amplitude $a_D$:** Neglecting the small $w^2$ term in the first approximation: $$Q \approx \frac{\sqrt{2}}{10} \int_0^\infty r^2 u(r) w(r) dr$$ Let $w(r) = a_D \tilde{w}(r)$ and $u(r) = a_S \tilde{u}(r) \approx \tilde{u}(r)$, such that $\int_0^\infty r^2 \tilde{u}(r)\tilde{w}(r) dr = \langle r^2 \rangle_{SD} \approx 2.05\text{ fm}^2$: $$Q \approx \frac{\sqrt{2}}{10} a_D \langle r^2 \rangle_{SD}$$ $$0.286\text{ fm}^2 = \frac{1.4142}{10} a_D (2.05\text{ fm}^2) = 0.2899 a_D$$ $$a_D \approx \frac{0.286}{0.2899} \approx 0.197$$ $$P_D = a_D^2 = (0.197)^2 \approx 0.0388 \approx 3.9\%$$ **(c) Verification via Magnetic Moment Discrepancy:** The theoretical magnetic dipole moment formula derived in Section 1.6 gives: $$\Delta\mu = \mu_d - (\mu_p + \mu_n) = -\frac{3}{2}\left( \mu_p + \mu_n - \frac{1}{2} \right) P_D$$ Substituting $\mu_p + \mu_n = 2.792847 - 1.913043 = 0.879804\text{ }\mu_N$: $$\Delta\mu = -1.5(0.879804 - 0.500000) P_D = -1.5(0.379804) P_D = -0.5697 P_D$$ For $P_D = 0.0388$: $$\Delta\mu_{\text{calc}} = -0.5697 \times 0.0388 \approx -0.0221\text{ }\mu_N$$ The measured discrepancy is $\Delta\mu_{\text{exp}} = -0.02237\text{ }\mu_N$. The values match to within $1\%$, rigorously confirming that a **$D$-state probability of $\approx 4\%$** simultaneously accounts for both the electric quadrupole moment and the magnetic dipole moment.
Final Answer & Verification

Complete rigorous derivation and proof detailed above.

SOLVED PROBLEM 1.3

Cross Section and Angular Distribution of Deuteron Photodisintegration

A beam of monochromatic $\gamma$-rays of energy $E_\gamma = 6.00\text{ MeV}$ is incident on a deuterium target. (a) Compute the kinetic energy of the ejected proton and neutron in the center-of-mass frame. (b) Using the Bethe-Peierls electric dipole ($E1$) cross section formula: $$\sigma_{E1} = \frac{8\pi \alpha}{3 M c^2} \frac{\sqrt{B}(E_\gamma - B)^{3/2}}{(E_\gamma/c^2)^3}$$ calculate the total electric dipole cross section $\sigma_{E1}$ in millibarns ($1\text{ mb} = 10^{-27}\text{ cm}^2 = 0.1\text{ fm}^2$). (c) Write down the differential cross section $\frac{d\sigma_{E1}}{d\Omega}(\theta)$ at laboratory angles $\theta = 0^{\circ}, 45^{\circ},$ and $90^{\circ}$ relative to the photon beam.

RIGOROUS DERIVATION & EXAM SOLUTION
Full Rigorous Analytical Solution
**(a) Center-of-Mass Kinetic Energy:** The deuteron binding energy is $B = 2.2246\text{ MeV}$. The total center-of-mass kinetic energy available to the two nucleons is: $$E_{\text{c.m.}} = E_\gamma - B = 6.00\text{ MeV} - 2.2246\text{ MeV} = 3.7754\text{ MeV}$$ Since $m_p \approx m_n$, this kinetic energy is shared equally: $$T_p = T_n = \frac{1}{2} E_{\text{c.m.}} = \frac{3.7754}{2} \approx 1.888\text{ MeV}$$ **(b) Total $E1$ Cross Section $\sigma_{E1}$:** Fine structure constant $\alpha = 1/137.036$, average nucleon mass $M c^2 = 938.92\text{ MeV}$: $$\sigma_{E1} = \frac{8\pi}{3(137.036)(938.92\text{ MeV})} \frac{\sqrt{2.2246\text{ MeV}} (3.7754\text{ MeV})^{3/2}}{(6.00\text{ MeV})^3} \hbar^2 c^2$$ Using $(\hbar c)^2 = (197.327\text{ MeV}\cdot\text{fm})^2 = 38938\text{ MeV}^2\cdot\text{fm}^2$: Prefactor: $$\frac{8\pi \times 38938}{3 \times 137.036 \times 938.92} = \frac{978635}{385994} \approx 2.5354\text{ fm}^2/\text{MeV}$$ Energy dependence factor: $$\sqrt{B} = \sqrt{2.2246} \approx 1.4915\text{ MeV}^{1/2}$$ $$(E_\gamma - B)^{3/2} = (3.7754)^{1.5} \approx 7.336\text{ MeV}^{3/2}$$ $$E_\gamma^3 = 6.00^3 = 216\text{ MeV}^3$$ $$\frac{(1.4915)(7.336)}{216} = \frac{10.9416}{216} \approx 0.050656\text{ MeV}^{-1}$$ Multiplying: $$\sigma_{E1} = 2.5354 \times 0.050656 \approx 0.1284\text{ fm}^2$$ Converting to millibarns ($1\text{ fm}^2 = 10\text{ mb} \implies 0.1\text{ fm}^2 = 1\text{ mb}$): $$\sigma_{E1} = 0.1284 \times 10\text{ mb} \approx 1.284\text{ mb} \approx 1.28\text{ mb}$$ The total electric dipole photodisintegration cross section is **$1.28\text{ mb}$**. **(c) Differential Cross Section $\frac{d\sigma_{E1}}{d\Omega}(\theta)$:** For pure electric dipole absorption from an unpolarized beam: $$\frac{d\sigma_{E1}}{d\Omega} = \frac{3}{8\pi} \sigma_{E1} \sin^2\theta = \frac{3 \times 1.284}{8\pi} \sin^2\theta \approx 0.153 \sin^2\theta\text{ mb/sr}$$ Evaluating at specific angles: - At $\theta = 0^{\circ}$ (forward direction along beam): $\sin^2(0) = 0 \implies \frac{d\sigma}{d\Omega} = \mathbf{0\text{ mb/sr}}$. - At $\theta = 45^{\circ}$: $\sin^2(45^{\circ}) = 0.5 \implies \frac{d\sigma}{d\Omega} = 0.153 \times 0.5 \approx \mathbf{0.0766\text{ mb/sr}}$. - At $\theta = 90^{\circ}$ (transverse direction): $\sin^2(90^{\circ}) = 1.0 \implies \frac{d\sigma}{d\Omega} = \mathbf{0.153\text{ mb/sr}}$.
Final Answer & Verification

Complete rigorous derivation and proof detailed above.